That makes sense
Third time lucky?


What on earth is going on in Thailand

Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra was criticized for retaining ownership of Shin Corp.  So he sold it, but his opponents complained that he had sold it to a Singaporean company and not paid tax on the proceeds.  They stepped up their campaign to make him resign, and Thaksin called their bluff by announcing an election.  Now his opponents say they will boycott the election.

And so it goes on.  Nothing Thaksin says or does (short of resigning) will satisfy his critics, and yet if he should resign there is (as far as I am aware) no obvious successor. 

I find myself agreeing with The Economist (subscription required) - Thaksin may be a dodgy character, but he was democratically elected and it would not be a good thing for him to be forced out of office:

THIS newspaper has never been a great fan of Thaksin Shinawatra, Thailand's embattled prime minister. His rise to power was fuelled by money, and his money obtained in part by patronage. When, in early 2001, he was on the point of winning his first election, we compared him to Italy's Silvio Berlusconi. It was not intended as a compliment.

In office, Mr Thaksin has been a mixed blessing. He has handled the economy reasonably efficiently, and has therefore managed to afford the extravagant handouts with which he wooed the rural electorate in 2001, and again last year. In other spheres, though, his touch has been much less sure. Sheer governmental incompetence, for example, is the main reason why discontent in Thailand's Muslim south has bubbled over into insurrection and bloodshed.


The danger in Thailand is that Mr Thaksin's foes will try to achieve through “people power” what they do not have the numbers to achieve at the polls, or that the army will revert to its previous habit of interfering in politics. In either case, it would not be Mr Thaksin who is democracy's enemy, but those who refuse to accept that he has won an electoral mandate.

If Thailand was a more mature democracy all this would be about as relevant as the Republicans impeaching Bill Clinton, but it isn't, and so the stakes are a bit higher.  Like The Economist, I don't feel entirely comfortable with supporting Thaksin against "the people", but really there is no alternative.  I hope it all gets sorted out one way or another.


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


I know it sounds terrible, but I just want a nice place to go to the beach. The Thais are lovely, as is the food. Other than the occasional massive wave, it's really a perfect holiday destination. In fact, I'd live there if they weren't so difficult abouth foreigners owning land, getting work permits etc. *and* if there were some way to stop all the bitching.

It seems everyone in Thailand has a hand out. To ask Thaksin to step down through undemocratic means is pretty much participating in the same system of "advantage" as he apparently is. Entitlement. It's the word of the century and only causes problems.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)